To read the texts click on the texts: Dt 7:6-11; 1 Jn 4:7-16; Mt 11:25-30
The
feast of the Most Sacred Heart is a movable feast, but is always celebrated on
the third Friday after Pentecost. Ever since the seventeenth century when St.
Margaret Mary Alacoque was granted visions of the Sacred Heart and asked to
spread this devotion, the Jesuits represented by her confessor St. Claude de la
Colombière, played a fundamental role in spreading this devotion. Colombière,
spoke with Margaret Mary a number of times and after much prayer, discernment
and reflection became convinced of the validity of her visions.
In
recent times, one of the most loved and admired Generals of the Society of
Jesus Fr. Pedro Arrupe was instrumental in reviving this devotion and placing
Jesuits once again at the forefront of spreading this devotion. This devotion according to Arrupe was “the
centre of the Ignatian experience”. It is an “extraordinarily effective means
as much for gaining personal perfection as for apostolic success”.
The
feast of the Sacred Heart is to be celebrated as a privilege and grace. However,
it is also a responsibility.
First,
the love that we receive from the Sacred Heart of Jesus is not a private
possession, but one that must be shared with all. Just as the Father makes no
distinction and makes the sun rise on the evil and on the good (Mt 5:45), so
must we in our sharing of the love of Christ.
Second,
the concern that God has for us and our Universe must be a concern which we
must show to our world. The wanton destruction of nature, excessive and abusive
use of scarce resources like water, indiscriminate cutting of trees for selfish
gain, unlawful and criminal killing of wild animals are signs that we are
working against God’s concern. If God cares for us so much, must we not care
for our world?
Third,
the intimate connection of the Sacred Heart and Eucharist reminds us that just
as Christ is so easily available to us, we must also be to each other. The
Eucharist and the feast of the Sacred Heart ought not to be private and passive
devotions, but celebrations that make us ready to reach out in service and
availability to anyone who needs us.
The
text for the feast is from the Gospel of Matthew. To understand it fully, two
points must be kept in mind. The first is that it is placed by Matthew after
three “negative” passages which begin at 11:2. These are the response of Jesus
to the disciples of John the Baptist to their question whether Jesus was the
Messiah, the exasperation with the crowd who do not recognize John nor Jesus,
and the denunciation of the cities of Chorazin, Bethsaida and Capernaum.
Indeed, this entire section of Matthew’s Gospel seems to lean on a sense of
apparent “failure” on the part of Jesus to measure up to the expectations that
all around him had in terms of what a “Messiah” would look like or act like.
The
second point is that this text is clearly a Matthean composition and is made of
three elements. The first two of these are found in Luke but in different
contexts and the third is exclusive to Matthew. In Matthew the audience is
clearly the crowds and so the words of Jesus here are meant for all.
The
passage appearing as it does in this context seeks to state that despite so
much of doubt and negativity, that despite so much of blindness and closed
attitudes, this is not the last word. Despite the fact that Jesus’ message has
been questioned by John the Baptist, rejected by many and especially the wise
and understanding and not paid heed to by the cities, yet the invitation and
message will find acceptance among the open and receptive of which there are
still some left. There is no arbitrariness in this. Rather, it is simply true
that for the most part the wise tend to become proud and self-sufficient in
their wisdom and particularly unreceptive regarding the new and the unexpected.
This is because they have already made up their minds about what kind of
Messiah is to come.
On
the other hand the childlike are most often unself-conscious, open, dependent,
and receptive. They are willing to let God work in their lives. They have not
decided in advance how God must act and are willing to let God be God. Thus
everything comes down finally to the person of Jesus and the nature of the
fulfilment he brings. He cannot be understood if he is restricted to
preconceived categories; he will not conform to human conceptual frameworks. He
must be understood as God knows him, as the one who on behalf of the Father
always does his will.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You may use the "Anonymous" option to leave a comment if you do not possess a Google Account. But please leave your name and URL as www.errolsj.com