A JESUIT'S BLOG
Thursday, 4 June 2026
Friday, June 5, 2026 - How do you usually address Jesus? Why do you use this title?
To read the texts click on the texts:Tobit 11:5-17; Mk 12:35-37
Since
Mark ended the previous episode by stating that after the scribes question and
Jesus’ response no one dared to ask Jesus any question, he has Jesus himself
ask the question about the Messiah as Son of David. In his interpretation of Ps
110,1 attributed to David, the Messiah is called Lord. If this is what David
says, then the Messiah cannot be also his son. Mark’s point is that the title
son of David is an inadequate title to describe who the Messiah really is.
Jesus
cannot be captured by titles or names. He is much bigger than any name that we
might use for him. And while we may know many things about him, his life and
mission, we need to make every attempt to KNOW him.
Wednesday, 3 June 2026
Thursday, June 4, 2026 - Will your love for God show in your love for at least one person today?
To read the texts click on the texts: 2 Timothy 2:8-15; Mk 12:28-34
While in Matthew 22,35,
the lawyer asks Jesus the question about the great commandment in order to test
Jesus; in Mark he is not hostile. As a matter of fact Mark mentions at the
beginning of the incident that he thought that Jesus had answered the Sadducees
well and at the end he commends Jesus for his answer. Jesus responds in the
words of the “Shema”, which speaks of love of God (Deut 6,5-6), but adds also
the love of neighbour (Lev 19,18). The scribe’s response to this is to
acknowledge Jesus’ answer as correct and to add that following these
commandments is greater than sacrifices and burnt offerings. Jesus concludes
the dialogue by stating that because the scribe has recognised what his
priorities are, he is not far from the kingdom of God.
Love of God cannot really
be separated from love of neighbour. The two go together. Our love for God is
made manifest and tangible only when we reach out in love to someone else.
While Paul gives a beautiful description of what love is and what it is not in
1 Corinthians 13, my own definition of love is that in love there is no “I”.
Tuesday, 2 June 2026
Wednesday, June 3, 2026 - To believe in the resurrection means to live each day as if were your last. Do you live in this way?
To read the texts click on the texts: 2 Timothy 1:1-3,6-12; Mk 12:18-27
Though belief in the
resurrection had developed around two centuries prior to the birth of Jesus,
there were many Jews who did not accept it. The Sadducees, especially, were
known to regard belief in the resurrection as not justified by the scriptures
or mentioned in them (Acts 23,8). In their question to Jesus to point out the
absurdity of the resurrection, they use the custom of Levirate marriage
mentioned in Deuteronomy 25,5 which states that the wife of a dead brother
shall not be married outside the family to a stranger, but by her husband’s
brother (Genesis 38,8). Their question is that if there were seven brothers and
all seven had the same woman as wife, whose wife would she be in the
resurrection. In his response Jesus first corrects their misunderstanding about
what the resurrection means and implies. In the resurrection there will no
longer be human institutions like marriage and so the question of being given
in and taken in marriage does not arise. Humans in the resurrected life will no
longer be constrained by the limits or relationships of their earthly bodies.
He then uses scripture to establish that resurrection is indeed mentioned in
the scripture and is about God’s revelation to Moses in Exodus 3,6-16 as the
God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and if these are mentioned though they are
dead, then he must be the God of the living, since they live in him. God is not
God of the dead but the living.
Too much of concern with
the afterlife or heaven and hell may lead to our not living fully this life on
earth. Our heaven at this moment is here on earth and we must strive towards
making it as enjoyable as possible not only for ourselves but also for those
around us.
Monday, 1 June 2026
Tuesday, June 2, 2026 - Does God have priority in your life? How does this show?
To read the texts click on the texts: 2 Peter 3:11-15,17-18; Mk 12:13-17
The Pharisees
theoretically accepted the position of the Zealots who refused to admit the
subjection of God’s people to a foreign power but they would not use force. The
question of the Pharisees and Herodians is asked to trap Jesus and so the
praise of Jesus is ironic and implies that Jesus is being asked to decide the
question because his impartiality mirrors that of God. They think they can trap
Jesus because if he said yes or No, he was bound to alienate one group or
another. If he supported the payment, he would make himself unpopular with the
people and if he said No, he would be politically suspect to the Roman
authorities. The tax was to be paid in Roman coinage and instead of answering
the question, Jesus first calls for the denarius. The denarius would bear a
portrait of the emperor Tiberius (14 - 37 C.E.). Jesus forces them to look at
the coin which would have been offensive to them, because having the Emperor’s
portrait on the coin violated Jewish rules of making images and worshipping
idols. As soon as they identify the head on the coin, Jesus points to them what
they already say, namely that the coin since it bears Caesar’s head belongs to
Caesar.
Jesus rejects the
position of the Zealots without accepting that of the Herodians who would be
willing to pay the tax.
By adding “and to God the
things that are God’s.” Jesus turns the pronouncement of paying taxes into a
spiritual challenge to meet ones obligations to God as conscientiously as one
meets the obligations of the state.
How often we too are so
conscientious in fulfilling our state duties because we are afraid of being
caught, but are lax with God.
Sunday, 31 May 2026
Monday, June 1, 2026 - If God were to ask for the produce of your life, what would be your response to him be?
To read the texts click on the texts: 2 Peter 1:2-7; Mk 12:1-12
This Parable is known
variously as the parable of the wicked tenants or the Parable of the Vineyard.
While the parable in Mark has been allegorised, it is not clear whether there
was a non-allegorical parable going back to Jesus. Those who are of the opinion
that there was a non-allegorical parable interpret it to mean that just as the
tenants took radical action, so radical action is required in order to gain the
kingdom. Others see the parable to mean that the kingdom will be taken away
from Israel’s false leadership and given to gentiles and sinners. Still others
see the parable to mean that God does not abandon and relentlessly seeks and
searches for them and longs for a response from them.
As the parable stands now
in Mark, it has been allegorised. The vineyard stands for Israel and the
murderous tenants for the bad leaders of Israel. The owner of the vineyard is
God who sent his servants to collect the produce due to him. The tenants treat
the servants shamefully and as the parable unfolds, so does the escalating
nature of violence, which culminates in the murder of the son. God, finally takes
matters into his own hands but does not destroy the vineyard, rather he gives
it to others whom he knows will give him what is due to him.
The authorities realise
that the parable is about them and this only hardens their stance against Jesus
and strengthens their resolve to destroy him.
All that we possess is
given to us in trust. This means that while we may use what we have, we have
also to be concerned about those who do not have and be generous with them.
Selfishness on our part leads to our thinking that we must use the things we have
exclusively without even the thought of sharing them with others.