A JESUIT'S BLOG
Sunday, 11 October 2026
Monday, October 12, 2026 - What sign are you seeking from the Lord? Will you believe in His love even without this sign?
To read the texts click on the texts: Gal 4:22-24,26-27,31 – 5:1; Lk 11:29-32
Jesus’
debate with the crowd following the exorcism of the demon that made a man mute
continues. The response of Jesus is not to give in to the demand of some for a
sign. While a similar saying is also found in Matthew (12,38-42) which
indicates that both Matthew and Luke have taken it from the “Q” source {Mark
also has the episode of the demand for a sign and Jesus’ response (Mk 8,11-12),
but it is much shorter and does not have the details found in both Matthew and
Luke}. However, Luke has so formulated the response of Jesus, that it forms an
inclusion. It begins and ends with Jonah. Through this, Luke has associated
Jonah’s preaching with Solomon’s wisdom. Since Luke makes this association, for
him the sign of Jonah was not Jonah’s being in the belly of the whale for three
days and three nights (Mt 12,40), but the call to repentance that Jonah
preached. As the people of Nineveh repented after the call by Jonah, so Jesus
calls the crowd to repentance after his proclamation. He refuses to give the
crowds any other sign, because any demand for a sign means that they have not
understood what Jesus is about, and what his mission is. Jesus also knows that
for those who believe, no sign is necessary, whereas for those who do not, no
sign is sufficient.
The
call to repentance is a call to look at everything in a new light. The old is
past, the new has come with the coming of Jesus. If one persists in the old way
of looking which is a way of finding God only in miraculous and spectacular
events, one will miss him. Now he can be found in all things and all things can
be found in him.
Saturday, 10 October 2026
Sunday, October 11, 2026 - Are you wearing the wedding garment?
To read the texts click on the texts: Isa 25:6-10; Phil 4:12-14.19-20; Mt 22:1-14
The
last four verses of today’s Gospel have caused much consternation when heard or
read and this is possible one reason why the Church allows these verses to be
omitted.
It
seems however, that they are part of the original parable even if seen as an
expansion and Matthew’s own composition, but if read bring out the whole
meaning of the parable. While at first glance it seems quite unreasonable to
expect someone who has been invited from the streets to have a wedding garment,
it must also be noted that all others who have also been invited from the
streets except this one are wearing theirs. This is an indication that the
others accepted the invitation and after doing so did something about it. On
the other hand, the one who did not have the wedding garment was there in body
but not in spirit. He was at the feast but was not partaking of it. He was
present yet absent. He sought the benefits of the feast without the required
response to the invitation. Thus he can make no response or claim ignorance
when he is questioned by the king. He knows what the appropriate garb is in
order to remain; and he knows well that he is not wearing it. The notion of
election here works together with, rather than against, the reality of human
responsibility.
This
is why it is made quite clear that there is no coercion or force on the part of
the king, but the issuance of an invitation. Those invited are free to respond
in any way they want, but must be prepared to face the consequences of this
response. Some of the original invitees make light of the invitation and
pretend as if they have not heard it. They ignore the messengers and go off to
do their own thing. These are engaged not in sin but in events of life which
have taken hold of them to such an extent that they cannot even understand the
privilege that they are receiving in being invited. Still others behave
irrationally by attacking and killing the messengers who bring the invitation
Since
the invitation is spurned by the original invitees, the king is forced to send new
invites to those who will accept them. These are the ones who are considered
the scum of society, who are found on the streets or byroads. While these fill
the banquet hall and accept the invitation willingly, it is also necessary for
them to show in action this acceptance which they have made in freedom. This
they do by wearing the required wedding garments which in this context can be
interpreted as being present in both body and mind at the wedding feast.
Matthew’s Gospel interprets this as doing deeds of righteousness. The
consequence of not having a wedding garment or not showing in action that one
has accepted the invitation is banishment from the feast. This is not the
punishment given by the king but one which the invited guest has brought on him
or herself.
An
invitation to a feast is also issued in the first reading from Isaiah. Those who will heed the call are invited to
the mountain of the Lord, Zion. Here is the choicest of food and drink which is
served in abundance. It is an invitation to feast and rejoice and an assurance
that all tears will be wiped away and the people who come will be accepted. All
reproach will be removed and God will reveal himself as a God who saves. This
salvation will be shown in the most tangible of ways in that death itself will
be destroyed.
Paul
in the second reading of today tells of how because he has accepted the
invitation in both words and deeds, he is completely sated. He does not hunger
or thirst for anything but has been fulfilled in every single aspect of his
life. The promise of Isaiah finds its meaning in the manner in which Paul lives
his life. He lacks nothing. He has everything. In every single situation of
life he is content.
The
challenge of the readings to each of us who are also called is to also be lived
out as those who are chosen. This is not a once for all response, but a
constant one since the invitation is constant. In order to be regarded as
chosen, the ones called must manifest through their lives in deeds of love and
service that the invitation to participate in the feast has been accepted.
Thus
while the good news is of an open invitation to everyone who is willing to
listen leaving no one out, the fact remains that the response has to be shown
through the actions of ones life. Not all who are invited are receptive to the
invitation of the Lord and thus not all will bring forth the deeds of
righteousness expected of the invitees. Those invited are expected to wear the
wedding garment.
Saturday, October 10, 2026 - How would you define “God’s Word” today? Do you put this “Word” into practice in your life? How?
To read the texts click on the texts: Gal 3:22-29; Lk 11:27-28
The
words, “While he was saying this” connect what follows to what has gone on
before. Jesus has just challenged his listeners to fill their lives with the
kingdom of God, and now a woman in the crowd blesses the mother of Jesus,
because of the beauty she sees in Jesus. While Jesus does not deny that his
mother is indeed blessed, he uses this opportunity to extend the blessing to
anyone who like his mother will hear the Word of God and put it into practice
in their lives.
If
the woman in the crowd was able to bless the womb that bore Jesus, it was
because she could see and experience the goodness in Jesus. This goodness was
manifested not only in what he said but in what he did and was therefore
visible in his person. If we like Jesus hear the word of God and act on it,
then others will pronounce the same blessing on us.
Thursday, 8 October 2026
Friday, October 9, 2026 - Which is the demon that has possessed you and does not leave you free? Will you attempt to get rid of that demon today?
To read the texts click on the texts: Gal 3:7-14; Lk 11:15-26
The
onlookers respond to the exorcism of a demon that made a man mute, in different
ways. While there are some who are amazed, others attribute Jesus’ power to
cast out demons to Beelzebul. This is an indication that no one doubted Jesus’
power to exorcise and heal. They attributed it to different sources. In his
response to this charge, Jesus says that since exorcisms represented a direct
assault on Satan’ power and kingdom, it is clear that he cannot be on Satan’s
side. Also, if Jesus’ exorcisms were performed by the power of Satan, the same
would have to be said of other exorcists belonging to their community. Instead
Jesus’ works indicate that the kingdom of God has indeed arrived. Through his
exorcisms, Satan’s power is broken. In the simile of the strong man and his
castle, Jesus explicates that he is the stronger one who overpowers Satan who
had guarded his kingdom well till this time. Finally Jesus invites his
listeners to take a stand for him. The saying here is strong. If one does not
positively opt for Jesus, one has opted against him. The time now is for
decision and choice.
Once
he has answered his critics (11,17-23), Jesus moves on to exhort his listeners
to fill their lives with the kingdom of God, because it is possible that
despite the exorcism, if a person persists in his old ways, he will be
possessed once again and this will be ever worse than before.
While
there is no doubt that Jesus did exorcise people who were possessed by demons,
we must avoid getting caught up with exorcisms ourselves. Rather, today there
are many subtle forms of “possession” which are more dangerous than “external
possession”. Some of these are consumerism, selfishness, ignorance and a better
than thou attitude. We need to ask the Lord to exorcise these demons from our
lives.
Wednesday, 7 October 2026
Thursday, October 8, 2026 - Do you give up easily when your prayers are not answered? Will you be shameless today? Will you persist today?
To read the texts click on the texts: Gal 3:1-5; Lk 11:5-13
Luke
11,5-8 is exclusive to Luke and deals with the assurance that God will answer
prayer. This point is implicitly made through the parable in these verses. It
is a parable from common experience. If the Greek word anaideia is translated
as “shameless” (which is it literal meaning), then the parable is stating that
it would be unthinkable in the setting of a Galilean village that a neighbour
would not get up to give his friend what he wants even if it meant disturbing
the entire family at midnight to oblige his friend. The reason why he would do
this is to avoid being shamed. However, it can also mean that the one who makes
the petition is shameless for going to the friend’s house at midnight to beg
for bread.
If
the translation of the word anaidea is “persistence” or “boldness”, then the
point is that it is the persistence of the one who asks for bread, which will
get him what he wants. The friend who gives the bread will be tired out by the
persistence of the one who is asking.
In
11,9-13, we have a three-fold admonition, “Ask, search and knock” (11,9-10),
followed by two rhetorical questions (11,11-12) both of which elicit the answer
“No, there is no one”.
The
final verse of this section 11,13 contrasts evil human beings with the heavenly
Father. If humans evil as they are will still give their children only what is
good, then the heavenly Father will do more than that. He will give the
greatest of gifts, the Holy Spirit to those who ask.
To
be without shame is also to be without ego. The one who is shameless is also
one who can persevere since he/she has nothing to lose. Perseverance is indeed
the key to open the door to God’s heart.