A JESUIT'S BLOG
Monday, 2 November 2026
Tuesday, November 3, 2026 - How have you responded to the invitation that God is constantly issuing?
To read the texts click on the texts: Phil 2:5-11; Lk 14:15-24
The
setting for the parable in these verses is the meal introduced in 14:1. It is
known as the parable of the great supper or banquet. After the host has sent
invitations to those whom he desired to come for his banquet, he sent his
servants to call those guests when everything was ready. The guests however
began to offer excuses.
The
first excused himself because he had bought a piece of land which he wanted to
go and see. This excuse is absurd, since no one would buy a piece of land
without first inspecting it. The second excused himself because he had bought
five yoke of oxen, which he had to go and see which again is absurd for the
same reason. These excuses bring out the fact that it is material possessions
and their hold on the persons concerned which prevent them for responding to
the invitation.
The
third guest allows family commitments to hinder his response. While such a
reason is plausible, it serves to highlight the fact of the total rejection of
the host’s invitations. On hearing the excuses through his servants, the host
is angry. He now reaches out to the poor, the crippled, the lame and the blind.
This list is identical to the list mentioned in 14:13 and the ones whom Jesus
challenged his host to invite. Since there is more room, a second invitation is
sent in order to fill the banquet hall.
The
point being made by the parable is that many of those who take for granted that
their places are reserved will find themselves out of a place and their place
taken by those whom they considered unworthy. While the invitation of the host
is important to enter the banquet hall, one excludes oneself from it by the
choice that one makes.
Procrastination
is a sin of many of us. We keep putting off till later what we can and
sometimes must do now. To get over this sin one needs to start now and not
later.
Sunday, 1 November 2026
Monday, November 2, 2026 - Commemoration of the Faithful Departed - “Death thou shalt die”
To read the texts click on the texts: Isa 25:6-9; 1 Thess 4:13-18; Mt 11:25-30
Whenever
the Commemoration of the faithful departed (All Souls) falls on a Sunday, the
following Sunday is the Feast of the Dedication of the Basilica of St. John
Lateran. Each of these days in its own way is an invitation to reflect on the
meaning of God’s people gathered to be church.
The
Commemoration of the faithful departed reminds us that we are still one with
those who have gone before us into eternal life, and that death is not and can
never be the end. Since they are alive we still owe them love and support in
Christ’s name, even beyond the grave.
While
the readings for the day may be chosen from a great variety found in the Masses
for the dead I have taken the ones mentioned above. This gives us an
opportunity to look at the mystery of death and the new life that Christ has
won and promised for all of us who believe.
The
question of where we go when we die is a question that has puzzled and
continues to puzzle the minds of many. It is a question that brings out the
fact that we realize that this life has to end and all of us no matter how
strong we are, no matter how rich or poor have to die someday. Death has been
and will continue to be a mystery. While we know that we have to die and today
with the advancement of science and technology can delay death by a few days,
months or even years in some cases and can tell how a person may have died,
what we will never know, what will always remain a mystery is why a person must
die at a particular moment in time. The feast of the Commemoration of the
faithful departed does not provide the answer to this question, but informs us
that for us as believers, death is not and can never be the end.
If
in the past the focus of the feast was on praying for the deliverance of the
“souls” in purgatory who were regarded as the “Church suffering” and needed our
prayers so that they could join in heaven the saints and add to the number of
the “Church triumphant”, today the focus is different. This focus is brought
out through the readings suggested for this day.
It
is quite amazing to find a text like the first reading of today in the Old
Testament in which we do not find any clear theology of the resurrection of
dead. During most of the time before Christ, only a vague idea of afterlife is
found: and "abode of the dead" called Sheol, whose inhabitants had
only a shadowy existence. God’s favour or disfavour was understood in terms of
the present life only. However, as hard times and tragedies befell the Jewish
people, ideas of life beyond this life began to emerge. Isaiah saw this as
eternal restoration of the nation where death would be destroyed and the whole
people would live forever. The text comes from within the block of material
known as 'The Isaiah Apocalypse' (Isa 24-27). The view of the future within
these chapters is universal in outlook and speaks of God's power in the cosmic
as well as the earthly realm. An invitation to a feast is also issued in the
first reading from Isaiah. Those who
will heed the call are invited to the mountain of the Lord, Zion. Here is the
choicest of food and drink which is served in abundance. It is an invitation to
feast and rejoice and an assurance that all tears will be wiped away and the
people who come will be accepted. All reproach will be removed and God will
reveal himself as a God who saves. This salvation will be shown in the most
tangible of ways in that death itself will be destroyed.
The
Gospel text is addressed to all those who accept the message of Jesus unlike
those in Chorazin and Bethsaida. To understand it fully, two points must be
kept in mind. The first is that it is placed by Matthew after three “negative”
passages which begin at 11:2. These are the response of Jesus to the disciples
of John the Baptist to their question whether Jesus was the Messiah, the
exasperation with the crowd who do not recognize John nor Jesus, and the
denunciation of the cities of Chorazin, Bethsaida and Capernaum. Indeed, this
entire section of Matthew’s Gospel seems to lean on a sense of apparent
“failure” on the part of Jesus to measure up to the expectations that all
around him had in terms of what a “Messiah” would look like or act like. The
second point is that this text is clearly a Matthean composition and is made of
three elements. This first two of these are found in Luke but in different
contexts and the third is exclusive to Matthew. In Matthew the audience is
clearly the crowds and so the words of Jesus here are meant for all. The
passage appearing as it does in this context seeks to state that despite so
much of doubt and negativity, that despite so much of blindness and closed
attitudes, this is not the last word. Despite the fact that Jesus’ message has
been questioned by John the Baptist, rejected by many and especially the wise
and understanding and not paid heed to by the cities, yet the invitation and
message will find acceptance among the open and receptive of which there are
still some left. There is no arbitrariness in this. Rather, it is simply true
that for the most part the wise tend to become proud and self-sufficient in
their wisdom and particularly unreceptive regarding the new and the unexpected.
On the other hand the childlike are most often unself-conscious, open,
dependent, and receptive. They are willing to let God work in their lives. They
have not decided in advance how God must act and are willing to let God be God.
They are willing to believe that in Jesus, God has indeed brought salvation
from sin, failure and even death itself. Jesus himself is an example of such
openness, which allowed him to receive everything directly from God. It is his
intimacy with the Father and not his religious genius, which is responsible for
this grace.
Even
as we commemorate the faithful departed we must remember that the readings of
today do not focus on death at all rather they focus on life and life in
abundance. In writing to the Thessalonians Paul makes clear that we cannot behave
as a people who have no hope. Our grief has to be a controlled grief. It has to
be a grief that has its basis in the hope that all who have died in Christ are
sure to rise with him. After God has spoken in Jesus, death is seen only as
transition from one kind of life to another. In the words of the sixteenth
century poet John Donne: “Death, thou shalt die”.
Saturday, 31 October 2026
Sunday, November 1, 2026 - All Saints Day - The Saints could, we also can.
To read the texts click on the texts: Rev 7:2-4,9-14; 1 Jn 3:1-3; Mt 5:1-12
“I
want to be in that number when the Saints go marching in”. These words from the
popular spiritual song “When the Saints Go Marching In” can be regarded as one
of the two important reasons why we celebrate the feast of All Saints.
In
the eighth century, Pope Gregory III consecrated a new chapel in the Basilica
of St. Peter to all saints on November 1, and he fixed the anniversary of this
dedication as the date of the feast. In the ninth century, Pope Gregory IV
extended the celebration of All Saints for the entire Church and since then,
the Church celebrates the feast of all Saints on this date.
While
the celebration of this solemnity may be seen on the one hand as a remembrance
or memorial of the numerous courageous men and women who lived lives of
selfless love, it may also be seen as an event which makes each of us aware
that we, too, as those who have gone before, are capable of living such lives.
It is a celebration of possibilities, potential and promise. They could, we
also can.
This
possibility and potential is brought out vividly in the first reading from the
Book of Revelation. While on the one hand there are the chosen one hundred and
forty four thousand made up of twelve thousand each from the twelve tribes of
Israel, there is also the great multitude from every nation and tribe and
language. This great multitude is a demonstration that the possibility of being
included is a very real one and that everyone who desires it can receive it.
While it is true that the choice is made by God, we as humans can desire it by
being willing to be washed in the blood of the lamb. This means the willingness
to undergo persecution, trials and tribulations and resisting the pressure to
conform to values of the “world” which include selfishness and self
centeredness.
This
willingness not to conform is precisely the reason why, in the Gospel text of
today, Jesus can declare as “blessed”, those who in the eyes of the world might
seem as those who are cursed. This declaration is a confident assertion of the
reality that is now and here. The beatitudes are not a “wish list” nor a
projection of the future state of what is to come. They are not conditions for
discipleship or preliminary requirements for an initiate. Rather, they describe
those who belong to the community of the Lord. They describe the Saints.
The
nine pronouncements, or declarations, are thus not statements about general
human virtues. Rather, they pronounce blessing on authentic disciples in the
Christian community. All the beatitudes apply to one group of people. They do
not describe nine different kinds of good people who get to go to heaven, but
are nine declarations about the blessedness, contrary to all appearances, of
the eschatological community living in anticipation of God’s reign.
“Poor
in spirit” definitely includes being economically poor, but goes further than
literal poverty. It refers also to an absence of arrogance and the presence of
dependence. It refers to an absence of ego and a presence of awareness that
one’s true identity is found only in God.
The
“mourning” of disciples is not because of the loss of something personal or
because of the death of a loved one. It is a mourning that is outward in that
the mourning is because things are the way they are. The mourning is because
God’s will is not being done and represents also a desire to do it. It is
mourning because of what is not and also because of what can be.
Meekness in the third beatitude represents not
a passive attitude of endurance or as is sometimes understood: gullibility.
Rather it is an active disposition that will refuse to use violent means. This
refusal does not represent inability, weakness or impotence. It represents
instead a deliberate choice of one’s way of proceeding.
This
is also what is meant by the desire or hunger for righteousness or justice. It
is the courage to do God’s will here and now with the confidence and optimism
that the kingdom is indeed now and here.
The
disciples are pure in heart or have a single-minded devotion to God and will
not be swayed by things that are temporary and passing. They will not be
divided or serve two masters. They will serve the Lord and the Lord alone.
This
single-minded service of the Lord will also enable them to work for peace and
reconciliation. They will bring together people of different experiences,
races, religions, and languages not through any kind of coercion or force, but
through the example of consecrated and selfless lives. All this they will do
with a deep sense of joy, because they know that this is really the only way to
live fully and completely the life that God in his graciousness has bestowed.
It
is the same God who calls them his children and to whom he is Father. The
disciples know that this is indeed what they are because they live lives that
are in keeping with their call.
The
elder who invited John to identify those robed in white continues to invite us
not only to identify them today, but also to have the confidence that, if we
dare to live as Jesus has lived and shown us and as the Saints who have gone
before us have lived, then we too can be counted in that number.
Friday, 30 October 2026
Saturday, October 31, 2026 - Do you agree with this statement, “Humility is a funny thing, once you think you’ve got it, you’ve lost it”? Why?
To read the texts click on the texts: Phil 1:18-26; Lk 14:1,7-11
Since
the text of today includes 14:1, which spoke of a Sabbath setting, this text
must be seen in that light. The text is set in the context of a meal, and
contains instructions on behaviour to guests who were invited. Meals were
important social ceremonies, and very little was left to chance.
In
his instructions, Jesus advocates what may be termed as practical humility,
with words from Proverbs 25:6-7. It must be noticed that when the host asks the
guest to move down from the place of honour, no term of address, respect or
affection is used, whereas when the host invites the guest to move up, the
guest is addressed as “friend”. The future tense that is used in 14,11 (“will
be humbled”, “will be exalted”) points beyond the immediate situation to the
reversal of values that is characteristic of the economy of God’s kingdom.
When
one realises that God accepts one unconditionally, the result is practical
humility.
Thursday, 29 October 2026
Friday, October 30, 2026 - Do you “try to be good” or do you “do the right thing”?
To read the texts click on the texts: Phil 1:1-11; Lk 14:1-6
The
scene described in the Gospel text is the third scene describing a healing on
the Sabbath (see 6,6-11; 13,10-17). However, in this scene the setting is a
meal rather than in the synagogue. The issue, however, is the same namely
whether a person’s needs takes precedence over rules and regulations.
The
man in the story suffers from dropsy or edema, which is the abnormal
accumulation of fluids in the body. It is a symptom of serious physical
problems. Unlike in the previous Sabbath healings, here there is no dialogue
with the man (as there was with the woman in 13,12) or questioning by the
Pharisees (as there was in 6,8; 13,14). Instead Jesus poses the question of
whether one is allowed to heal on the Sabbath. The healing is narrated simply,
and hence the focus is removed from it and placed on the second question of
Jesus, which is connected with the first. Since there is the mention of
“son/child” who has fallen into well, the point seems to be the urgency of the
situation and not as in the case of the question asked in 13,15 where the
argument is from the lesser to the greater. The silence of Jesus’ opponents to
both questions concedes to him the victory. The point has been made; human need
even if not urgent takes precedence over rules and regulations.