To read the texts click on the texts: Jer 1:4-5, 17, 18-19; 1 Cor 12:31-13:13; Lk4:21-30
The concluding verse in the Gospel reading of
today contains the response of Jesus to the rejection that he faced in his
hometown. “But he (Jesus) passed through the midst of them and went on his
way”, summarizes the meaning of the entire episode of Jesus in the
synagogue. This last verse also throws
light on the first and second readings of today.
The first public act of Jesus, in the Gospel of
Luke, takes place after his baptism and after overcoming temptation. This first public act is his reading the text
from Isaiah in the synagogue at Nazareth, his hometown. The initial response of
those who listen to him is positive. “They spoke well of him”, and they
marvelled at his graciousness. However, this positive response soon became, not
merely negative but, antagonistic, so much so that they wanted to throw Jesus
down the cliff. What were the possible
reasons for this change?
The answer to this question is found, not only in
the Gospel text itself, but also, in the first reading of today which contains
the meaning of the vocation of a prophet. The people of Jesus’ hometown had set
their minds about what they wanted to hear. As long as the content of Jesus’
proclamation coincided with their way of thinking, everything was bright and
sunny, and they thought him gracious but, from the moment it differed, the
antagonism began. This was because what Jesus was saying was something that was
radically new and people generally do not like to hear new things. They prefer
the old, the tried, the tested, the familiar, and that with which they are
comfortable. They had convinced themselves that they were, indeed, the chosen
people and that God’s concern, care, and mercy, were restricted to them, and
for them, exclusively. However, Jesus revealed that, while he had come to
comfort the afflicted, he had also come to afflict the comfortable. This meant
that, no matter how strongly they opposed the idea, God’s graciousness, mercy,
forgiveness, and love, could never be restricted to any one particular group. Those gifts were available to anyone and
everyone who was open to receive them. There would be no “chosen people”
because everyone was now chosen. The
grace that flowed, which was unmerited, was also unrestricted. It was given
freely, it was given in abundance, and it was given without consideration of
caste, colour, or creed.
This interpretation of Jesus was not made up by
him, but was the outcome of his own experience at his baptism and after. He was
so convinced of this truth that he did not mind becoming unpopular and disliked
because he spoke what God commanded him to speak. He spoke on behalf of God as
the prophet is wont to do. He would brook no compromise.
This command to speak God’s word came also to the
prophet Jeremiah, as the first reading of today tells us and, like in the case
of Jesus, the command was not arbitrary but deliberate. Jeremiah, too, was
chosen by God to speak a specific word. It was a word that would not
necessarily be popular but it was a word that would be fulfilled. Jeremiah
would have to speak that word, no matter the consequences, because it was a
word that was true. God also gave Jeremiah encouragement. The encouragement was
that God would sustain him, even in the most difficult moments of his life.
Though initially reluctant, Jeremiah obeyed the command of the Lord and spoke
God’s word to all.
Thus, the work of a prophet is not a private
matter. It has to do with the world at large. It is not confined to a
particular community. It is not an
exclusive word. More importantly, it is
not theoretical but a very practical and tangible word. It is about what is
going on in the world and about what God is going to do about it. It is, thus,
a word that threatens the wrong doers and yet, a word that comforts the
oppressed and the down trodden. Since the wrong doers are threatened by the
word, the life of the prophet is always in danger. It is very likely that those
to whom the word applies might not want to hear it. This is because it calls for a radical transformation
on their part and this, very few are willing to do. Even as this is so, the
prophet knows that he/she cannot but speak the word. The prophet’s compulsion
comes from within when the call is genuine, and no threat, intimidation,
bullying, or pressure, can put an end to the word that must be spoken. This was
the case with Jeremiah and, even more clearly, the case with Jesus. The last verse of today’s Gospel makes this
explicit. Even at the risk of danger to his life, Jesus would not be deterred
from his mission and task. He knew that he stood under a higher calling and the
assurance and confidence that he received from God was sufficient to sustain
him.
This basis of the confidence that Jesus had, and
the assurance that he received, is given by Paul in the second reading of today
where he explains the meaning of love. Jesus was aware that he was loved
unconditionally by the Father which, for him, meant that nothing that was
detrimental would ever happen to him. His experience of being loved by the
Father was so powerful that he could only respond be being obedient to the
Father’s command to speak words of unconditional and eternal love.
The challenge that the readings pose to each one
us who are disciples of Jesus is to continue to speak that prophetic word which
the world needs so much to hear today. It is a word which must make the poor
aware of their rights and privileges. It
is a word which must make those who still engage in oppression and domination
of the poor realise the folly of their ways. It is a word that must be spoken
boldly and courageously. It is a word that must be spoken unflinchingly and
fearlessly. It is a word that must be spoken because it is the word that comes,
even today, from God.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You may use the "Anonymous" option to leave a comment if you do not possess a Google Account. But please leave your name and URL as www.errolsj.com