To read the texts click on the texts: Isa 56:1, 6-7; Rom 11:13-15, 29-32; Mt 15:21-28
It took Winston Churchill three
years to get through the eighth grade, because he couldn’t pass English.
Ironically, many years later he was asked to give the commencement address at
the Oxford University. His now famous speech consisted of only three words:
“Never give up!” While this theme of perseverance and never giving up is surely
one of the themes of the readings of today, another theme that also comes out
powerfully is the movement from particularity to the universality of God’s
love.
There is no doubt that Jesus
appears to be speaking to the Canaanite woman in the Gospel text of today in
extremely harsh terms. He disregards the heartfelt and sincere plea for mercy
made by the woman, and makes it clear that his mission, at this time, is for
the lost sheep of the house of Israel, and even likens the woman to a dog. Some
have attempted to soften this harshness by suggesting that Jesus’ retort to the
woman was said with a twinkle in his eye and a smile on his lips or that Jesus
did not mean stray dogs but house pets.
However, nothing in the text warrants such interpretations and when
compared with the similar incident in Mark, which allows for a mission to the
Gentiles following the mission to the Jews, the retort of Jesus in Matthew is
harsher, leaving no apparent scope for a Gentile mission: “It is not good to
take the children’s bread and throw it to the dogs.”
The Jews are the children and the
Gentiles are the dogs. The epithet “dogs” for Gentiles had derogatory
connotations. Dogs roamed the streets scavenging for food, and the Jews
considered them unclean animals. The Gentiles cannot get what belongs to the
Jews. Thus Jesus not only flatly refuses the woman’s request; he also seems to
insult her.
The woman, however, will neither
be excluded nor allow herself to be insulted. She will persevere and will
overcome. She will keep on keeping on. She will neither give up nor give in.
She meets Jesus’ initial stony silence with more pleading. She drowns out the
disciples’ request for Jesus to send her away with her own repeated requests
for Jesus to have mercy. She factually negates his exclusive mission to the
Jews when she, a Gentile calls him Lord and worships him. Finally, she cleverly
turns his own maxim supporting exclusivism into an illustration of inclusivism
in salvation. Accepting the designation “dogs” for Gentiles, she turns it to
the Gentiles’ advantage. “Yes, Lord,” she counters Jesus, “but even the dogs eat
the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.” In her maxim the dogs and the
children both eat. And they eat simultaneously. She bests the Matthean Jesus:
She denies both exclusivism and sequential priority in salvation based on
ethnic identity. The Gentiles can have at least the crumbs of salvation if not
the bread, and they can have it now. She challenges Jesus to rise up to a new,
ethnically broadened sense of his mission and his Lordship. The woman’s brash
courage actually “converts” Jesus. Though Jesus had limited his mission to the
sons and daughters of Israel, here he crosses this self-imposed boundary to
bring merciful healing to a Gentile. The woman brings him to the full
implications of his mission.
This gospel passage thus reveals
that Jesus’ understanding of God’s saving work entails both the particular and
the universal. He knew that this woman was a Canaanite; he knew that he was a
Jew and had been sent to Israel yet this did not exclude the limits of God’s
gracious work in and through him. He also knew that God’s redemptive work
reached across the boundaries of difference without necessarily obliterating
them. God in Christ did not make this woman and her daughter into something
other than Canaanites, but in response to the woman’s faith he did bring
healing to her daughter.
This is reiterated by Paul in the
second reading of today who, writing to the Romans, asserts that he who is, “an
Israelite himself, a descendant of Abraham”, expresses hope for Israel because
“salvation has come to the Gentiles”. When either Gentiles or Jews, women or
men, are saved, they remain Gentiles or Jews, women or men, yet they are saved
in the same way i.e. through faith. And, this salvation is the result of God’s
grace and mercy which is blind to differences of ethnicity, gender, or
nationality.
The fact that such differences to not
constitute a barrier to the love of God do not mean, however, that God’s saving
work is meaninglessly indiscriminate. Those whom God welcomes into his “house
of prayer for all nations” are those who “bind themselves to the Lord… to be
his servants.” They are vessels of God’s justice. As people of faith hey hear
the Lord in the depths of their hearts calling them to, “do what is right.”
These are people like the Canaanite woman, who persevered in faith in the only
hope she had.
The call and challenge to us
today is to continue to persevere, even if at times it seems that our prayers
are not being answered and that there seems to be no solution in sight. It is
also an invitation to realize the inclusive nature of God’s unconditional and
magnanimous love.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You may use the "Anonymous" option to leave a comment if you do not possess a Google Account. But please leave your name and URL as www.errolsj.com