To read the texts click on the texts: Dt 7:6-11; 1 Jn 4:7-16; Mt 11:25-30
The feast of the Most Sacred Heart is a movable feast,
but is always celebrated on the third Friday after Pentecost. Ever since the
seventeenth century when St. Margaret Mary Alacoque was granted visions of the
Sacred Heart and asked to spread this devotion, the Jesuits represented by her
confessor St. Claude de la Colombière, played a fundamental role in spreading
this devotion. Colombière, spoke with Margaret Mary a number of times and after
much prayer, discernment and reflection became convinced of the validity of her
visions.
In recent
times, one of the most loved and admired Generals of the Society of Jesus Fr. Pedro
Arrupe was instrumental in reviving this devotion and placing Jesuits once
again at the forefront of spreading this devotion. This devotion according to Arrupe was “the
centre of the Ignatian experience”. It is an “extraordinarily effective means
as much for gaining personal perfection as for apostolic success”.
The feast of the Sacred Heart is to be celebrated
as a privilege and grace. However, it is also a responsibility.
First, the love
that we receive from the Sacred Heart of Jesus is not a private possession, but
one that must be shared with all. Just as the Father makes no distinction and
makes the sun rise on the evil and on the good (Mt 5:45), so must we in our
sharing of the love of Christ.
Second, the concern that God has for us and our
Universe must be a concern which we must show to our world. The wanton
destruction of nature, excessive and abusive use of scarce resources like
water, indiscriminate cutting of trees for selfish gain, unlawful and criminal
killing of wild animals are signs that we are working against God’s concern. If
God cares for us so much, must we not care for our world?
Third, the intimate
connection of the Sacred Heart and Eucharist reminds us that just as Christ is
so easily available to us, we must also be to each other. The Eucharist and the
feast of the Sacred Heart ought not to be private and passive devotions, but
celebrations that make us ready to reach out in service and availability to
anyone who needs us.
The text for the feast is from the Gospel of Matthew. To understand it fully, two points must be kept in mind. The first is that it is placed by Matthew after three “negative” passages which begin at 11:2. These are the response of Jesus to the disciples of John the Baptist to their question whether Jesus was the Messiah, the exasperation with the crowd who do not recognize John nor Jesus, and the denunciation of the cities of Chorazin, Bethsaida and Capernaum. Indeed, this entire section of Matthew’s Gospel seems to lean on a sense of apparent “failure” on the part of Jesus to measure up to the expectations that all around him had in terms of what a “Messiah” would look like or act like.
The second point is that this text is clearly a Matthean composition and is made of three elements. The first two of these are found in Luke but in different contexts and the third is exclusive to Matthew. In Matthew the audience is clearly the crowds and so the words of Jesus here are meant for all.
The passage appearing as it does in this context seeks to state that despite so much of doubt and negativity, that despite so much of blindness and closed attitudes, this is not the last word. Despite the fact that Jesus’ message has been questioned by John the Baptist, rejected by many and especially the wise and understanding and not paid heed to by the cities, yet the invitation and message will find acceptance among the open and receptive of which there are still some left. There is no arbitrariness in this. Rather, it is simply true that for the most part the wise tend to become proud and self-sufficient in their wisdom and particularly unreceptive regarding the new and the unexpected. This is because they have already made up their minds about what kind of Messiah is to come.
On the other hand the childlike are most often unself-conscious, open, dependent, and receptive. They are willing to let God work in their lives. They have not decided in advance how God must act and are willing to let God be God. Thus everything comes down finally to the person of Jesus and the nature of the fulfilment he brings. He cannot be understood if he is restricted to preconceived categories; he will not conform to human conceptual frameworks. He must be understood as God knows him, as the one who on behalf of the Father always does his will.
On the other hand the childlike are most often unself-conscious, open, dependent, and receptive. They are willing to let God work in their lives. They have not decided in advance how God must act and are willing to let God be God. Thus everything comes down finally to the person of Jesus and the nature of the fulfilment he brings. He cannot be understood if he is restricted to preconceived categories; he will not conform to human conceptual frameworks. He must be understood as God knows him, as the one who on behalf of the Father always does his will.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You may use the "Anonymous" option to leave a comment if you do not possess a Google Account. But please leave your name and URL as www.errolsj.com