To read the texts click on the texts: 1 Samuel 17:32-33,37,40-51; Mark 3:1-6
The Gospel text of today concerns a
Sabbath controversy. Though Mark does not specify at the beginning of this episode
who it was that was watching Jesus for a reason to accuse him, at the end of
the episode they are named as Pharisees and Herodians. While Pharisees had no
political authority at the time of Jesus, they were influential. Herodians were
a group of wealthy people who were partisans of Herod Antipas.
It is important to note that Jesus does nothing
to break the Sabbath rest, but his question is the reason for the hostility.
The response to Jesus' question is silence which here may be interpreted as an
indication of the hostility of his opponents and of their intention to destroy
him. Anyone who truly cares about the law will agree with Jesus and rejoice
that a man has been made whole again. Though the man in this case is not in any
way near death, Jesus adds to the second part of his question the words "to
save life or to kill?" This seems to be Mark's way of anticipating the
intentions of Jesus' opponents. The point he seems to be making is that they
object to someone being made whole on the Sabbath because they are concerned
about the law, yet on the same Sabbath, they will not hesitate to plot the
destruction of someone else. The contrast between their words and their deeds
is strongly brought out.
Often in our lives there is a dichotomy
between what we say and what we do. Our actions do not always match our words.
There are also times when we say one thing and do another. The call of the text
of today is to be as consistent as we possibly can. One way of doing this is to
avoid judging others too easily. Another way would be to avoid promising what
we know we will not be able to deliver and to think carefully before we speak
and commit.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You may use the "Anonymous" option to leave a comment if you do not possess a Google Account. But please leave your name and URL as www.errolsj.com