Saturday, 6 June 2026
Sunday, June 7, 2026 - The Feast of Corpus Christi - The Body and Blood of Christ
To read the texts click on the texts: Deut 8:2-3, 14-16; 1 Cor 10:16-17; Jn6:51-58
A
team of Russians and Americans were on a common expedition. Among their cabin
foodstuff was Russian black bread. It was tasty but hard on the teeth. During a
meal an American bit into a piece and snapped a tooth. He threw the bread
overboard and growled: “Lousy Communist bread.” The Russian countered: “It is
not lousy communist bread, but a shaky capitalist tooth.” Some of us may
complain in a similar manner about the Eucharist being useless. However, if we
do not experience the transforming power of the Eucharist it is not on account
of the Eucharist but on account of our shaky faith and lack of understanding of
what the Eucharist really means
The
feast of Corpus Christi is usually thought to be the feast of the Eucharist and
while this is certainly true, it would be a mistake to restrict the
understanding of the feast to the ritual of the Eucharist. The feast goes
beyond the ritual to life itself, just as the Eucharist does.
The
Eucharist is both a sacrament and a sacrifice. The Eucharist is a sacrament, an
outward sign in and through which we meet Christ who shares his life of grace
with us. Through signs of bread and wine he nourishes and strengthens us for
our journey through life. We see with human eyes what looks like bread and
wine. We see with eyes of faith, not bread and wine, but the risen, living Lord
Jesus.
The
Eucharist is a sacrifice, the representation or reliving of Christ’s
sacrificial death on Good Friday and of his Resurrection on Easter Sunday.
The
scripture readings today stress how God made a covenant with His people, first
through Moses and then, finally and forever, through Christ, a covenant sealed
and ratified by his blood. This covenant or bond of love between God and us is
renewed and deepened through and in every Eucharist or Mass.
The
second reading today, from Paul, is the earliest recorded story of anything
Jesus did. And that earliest story is about a meal, the Last Supper, which
Jesus shared with his disciples. In a very particular way, he made that meal a
way to remember him. It brings forward his sacrifice and death and
resurrection, his fellowship and unity with us, and everything he taught us.
And he did not want his followers to eat it just once that night but to do it
again and again, so that we continue to remember.
St
Augustine often stressed to his parishioners a unique quality of the
Eucharistic food. The ordinary food we eat, he says, becomes part of us. We are
what we eat. But partaking of the Eucharist, we become part of Jesus, We become
more Christ like, more patient and kind, more forgiving and understanding. We
still live our ordinary daily lives, but it is Our Lord who inspires our
attitudes and actions. We begin to see
people and events through his eyes, to think as he did. When Jesus was on this
earth, he used his own hands to reach out to people, but when he wants to feed
the poor today, he uses my hands, your hands to do this.
Surely,
we hunger and thirst for something new, when we share in the grief, anger,
misery and neglect of the impoverished, the unjustly accused, and victims of
violence caused by religious intolerance, ethnic hatred, terrorism and racism.
We are hungry indeed for peace and thirsty for reconciliation in this our
troubled world. We are hungry and thirsty for a new world, a world where we
will look one another in the eye and recognize the kinship of sisters and
brothers who are all children of God. The promise of this new world is set
forth in the strongest possible terms when Jesus declares, “Those who eat my
flesh and drink my blood abide in me and I in them…”
This
feast, then, of the Body of Christ, sums up three important confessions of our
faith. First, and most important, God became physically present in the person
of Christ – true God and true Man. Secondly; God continues to be present in His
people as they form the Mystical Body of Christ in his Church. And, thirdly,
God becomes present in the form of bread and wine on the altar at Mass.
Eucharist, then, should not remain simply a “going to” or “taking of” that
begins and ends in the sanctuary. It should become the deepest expression of
our communion with Christ.
Friday, 5 June 2026
Saturday, June 6, 2026 - How often in a day do you let the opinion of others affect your behaviour? What will you do about it today?
To read the texts click on the texts:Tobit 12:1,5-15,20; Mk 12:38-44
There
are two parts to the text of today. The first deals with the condemnation of
the scribes (12,38-40) and the second the commendation of a widow (12,41-44).
The
charge against the scribes is that they have no concern for anyone except
themselves. This lack of concern is shown in the behaviour they exhibited.
Their words do not correspond to their actions and they do what they do only
for external show.
Since
one of the charges against the scribes was that they devour widows’ houses, the
second part of the text speaks about a poor widow. The widow unlike the scribes
has no concern for self and this is shown in her willingness to give everything
to God. She is what she does.
So
many of us live our lives based on the opinion of others. We want others to
think well of us and will often act in such a way that meets their approval.
There are also times when we may not be convinced of something and yet would do
it only because we want to show externally that we are “part of the crowd”.
When we behave in this manner we are imitating the scribes.
Thursday, 4 June 2026
Friday, June 5, 2026 - How do you usually address Jesus? Why do you use this title?
To read the texts click on the texts:Tobit 11:5-17; Mk 12:35-37
Since
Mark ended the previous episode by stating that after the scribes question and
Jesus’ response no one dared to ask Jesus any question, he has Jesus himself
ask the question about the Messiah as Son of David. In his interpretation of Ps
110,1 attributed to David, the Messiah is called Lord. If this is what David
says, then the Messiah cannot be also his son. Mark’s point is that the title
son of David is an inadequate title to describe who the Messiah really is.
Jesus
cannot be captured by titles or names. He is much bigger than any name that we
might use for him. And while we may know many things about him, his life and
mission, we need to make every attempt to KNOW him.
Wednesday, 3 June 2026
Thursday, June 4, 2026 - Will your love for God show in your love for at least one person today?
To read the texts click on the texts: 2 Timothy 2:8-15; Mk 12:28-34
While in Matthew 22,35,
the lawyer asks Jesus the question about the great commandment in order to test
Jesus; in Mark he is not hostile. As a matter of fact Mark mentions at the
beginning of the incident that he thought that Jesus had answered the Sadducees
well and at the end he commends Jesus for his answer. Jesus responds in the
words of the “Shema”, which speaks of love of God (Deut 6,5-6), but adds also
the love of neighbour (Lev 19,18). The scribe’s response to this is to
acknowledge Jesus’ answer as correct and to add that following these
commandments is greater than sacrifices and burnt offerings. Jesus concludes
the dialogue by stating that because the scribe has recognised what his
priorities are, he is not far from the kingdom of God.
Love of God cannot really
be separated from love of neighbour. The two go together. Our love for God is
made manifest and tangible only when we reach out in love to someone else.
While Paul gives a beautiful description of what love is and what it is not in
1 Corinthians 13, my own definition of love is that in love there is no “I”.
Tuesday, 2 June 2026
Wednesday, June 3, 2026 - To believe in the resurrection means to live each day as if were your last. Do you live in this way?
To read the texts click on the texts: 2 Timothy 1:1-3,6-12; Mk 12:18-27
Though belief in the
resurrection had developed around two centuries prior to the birth of Jesus,
there were many Jews who did not accept it. The Sadducees, especially, were
known to regard belief in the resurrection as not justified by the scriptures
or mentioned in them (Acts 23,8). In their question to Jesus to point out the
absurdity of the resurrection, they use the custom of Levirate marriage
mentioned in Deuteronomy 25,5 which states that the wife of a dead brother
shall not be married outside the family to a stranger, but by her husband’s
brother (Genesis 38,8). Their question is that if there were seven brothers and
all seven had the same woman as wife, whose wife would she be in the
resurrection. In his response Jesus first corrects their misunderstanding about
what the resurrection means and implies. In the resurrection there will no
longer be human institutions like marriage and so the question of being given
in and taken in marriage does not arise. Humans in the resurrected life will no
longer be constrained by the limits or relationships of their earthly bodies.
He then uses scripture to establish that resurrection is indeed mentioned in
the scripture and is about God’s revelation to Moses in Exodus 3,6-16 as the
God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and if these are mentioned though they are
dead, then he must be the God of the living, since they live in him. God is not
God of the dead but the living.
Too much of concern with
the afterlife or heaven and hell may lead to our not living fully this life on
earth. Our heaven at this moment is here on earth and we must strive towards
making it as enjoyable as possible not only for ourselves but also for those
around us.
Monday, 1 June 2026
Tuesday, June 2, 2026 - Does God have priority in your life? How does this show?
To read the texts click on the texts: 2 Peter 3:11-15,17-18; Mk 12:13-17
The Pharisees
theoretically accepted the position of the Zealots who refused to admit the
subjection of God’s people to a foreign power but they would not use force. The
question of the Pharisees and Herodians is asked to trap Jesus and so the
praise of Jesus is ironic and implies that Jesus is being asked to decide the
question because his impartiality mirrors that of God. They think they can trap
Jesus because if he said yes or No, he was bound to alienate one group or
another. If he supported the payment, he would make himself unpopular with the
people and if he said No, he would be politically suspect to the Roman
authorities. The tax was to be paid in Roman coinage and instead of answering
the question, Jesus first calls for the denarius. The denarius would bear a
portrait of the emperor Tiberius (14 - 37 C.E.). Jesus forces them to look at
the coin which would have been offensive to them, because having the Emperor’s
portrait on the coin violated Jewish rules of making images and worshipping
idols. As soon as they identify the head on the coin, Jesus points to them what
they already say, namely that the coin since it bears Caesar’s head belongs to
Caesar.
Jesus rejects the
position of the Zealots without accepting that of the Herodians who would be
willing to pay the tax.
By adding “and to God the
things that are God’s.” Jesus turns the pronouncement of paying taxes into a
spiritual challenge to meet ones obligations to God as conscientiously as one
meets the obligations of the state.
How often we too are so
conscientious in fulfilling our state duties because we are afraid of being
caught, but are lax with God.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)