To read the texts click on the texts: Jonah 1:1-2:1,11; Lk 10:25-37
Our text for today contains the Parable of The Good Samaritan.
This is a parable that is found only in the Gospel of Luke, and the context in
Luke is the question that is asked by a lawyer regarding eternal life. In
Matthew and Luke, the lawyer is hostile (not so in Mark), because the question
is asked to “test” Jesus. While in Matthew (22:34-40) and Mark (12:28-31) the
question is about the greatest commandment, and Jesus answers the question quoting
from Deuteronomy and Leviticus, in Luke, Jesus asks the lawyer a counter
question and gets him (the lawyer) to answer.
Deuteronomy 6:4-9 (Love of God)
was part of the “Shema” (the prayer to “Hear”), repeated twice each day, but it
had not been linked to Leviticus 19:18 (Love of neighbour) as it is here. Since
it is the lawyer who answers, Jesus responds with a commendation (“You
have answered right; do this, and you will live.”)
Since the lawyer was forced
to answer and cede the upper hand, he does not give up, but asks a question
over which there was some controversy – “Who is my neighbour?” In his response
to this question, Jesus tells the parable of the Good Samaritan. This parable
has often been interpreted as one in which Jesus is telling us that those in
need are our neighbours, or that it has an anticlerical edge, in which Jesus is
showing up the priestly class by mentioning priest and Levite as not reaching
out to the one in need. If these were the meanings, then there would be no need
to make the third person that passed by that way, a Samaritan. The third person
could have been a lay Jew. The reason why the third person is a Samaritan is
because Jesus wanted the lawyer who was a Jew, to go beyond the narrow
definition of neighbour, to go beyond his prejudice, his bias, and his
stereotyping. When Israel was split into kingdoms after the death of Solomon in
around 922 BCE, the North (named Israel which had its capital at Samaria) and
the South (Judah which had its capital as Jerusalem), it became the target for
its neighbours, because its strength was divide. In 722 BCE, the Assyrians
captured Israel and its capital Samaria and took as their wives and concubines
Israeli women. The children by that union were known as Samaritans and till the
time of Jesus were regarded as inferior and outcasts by their former Jewish
brothers (and sisters). Jesus is thus asking the Jew (the lawyer) if he can get
rid of his negative way of looking at the Samaritan, and regard him also as
neighbour. It is interesting that at the end of the parable, Jesus overturns
the lawyer’s question. Jesus asks, “Who was neighbour to the one who fell among
robbers?” whereas the lawyers question was “Who is my neighbour?” The Samaritan
is indeed, neighbour.
We often look at people with tainted glasses or a prejudiced
vision. We tend to categorise them and place them in neat compartments based on
their backgrounds. This attitude leads to stereotyping people and not being
able to see them as they are. Albert Einstein said this about a prejudice, “It
is easier to disintegrate an atom than a prejudice”.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You may use the "Anonymous" option to leave a comment if you do not possess a Google Account. But please leave your name and URL as www.errolsj.com