To read the texts click on the texts: Isa 56:1, 6-7; Rom 11:13-15, 29-32; Mt 15:21-28
It took Winston Churchill
three years to get through the eighth grade, because he couldn’t pass English.
Ironically, many years later he was asked to give the commencement address at
the Oxford University. His now famous speech consisted of only three words:
“Never give up!” While this theme of perseverance and never giving up is surely
one of the themes of the readings of today, another theme that also comes out
powerfully is the movement from particularity to the universality of God’s
love.
There is no doubt that
Jesus appears to be speaking to the Canaanite woman in the Gospel text of today
in extremely harsh terms. He disregards the heartfelt and sincere plea for
mercy made by the woman, and makes it clear that his mission, at this time, is
for the lost sheep of the house of Israel, and even likens the woman to a dog.
Some have attempted to soften this harshness by suggesting that Jesus’ retort
to the woman was said with a twinkle in his eye and a smile on his lips or that
Jesus did not mean stray dogs but house pets.
However, nothing in the text warrants such interpretations and when
compared with the similar incident in Mark, which allows for a mission to the
Gentiles following the mission to the Jews, the retort of Jesus in Matthew is
harsher, leaving no apparent scope for a Gentile mission: “It is not good to
take the children’s bread and throw it to the dogs.”
The Jews are the children
and the Gentiles are the dogs. The epithet “dogs” for Gentiles had derogatory
connotations. Dogs roamed the streets scavenging for food, and the Jews
considered them unclean animals. The Gentiles cannot get what belongs to the
Jews. Thus Jesus not only flatly refuses the woman’s request; he also seems to
insult her.
The woman, however, will
neither be excluded nor allow herself to be insulted. She will persevere and
will overcome. She will keep on keeping on. She will neither give up nor give
in. She meets Jesus’ initial stony silence with more pleading. She drowns out
the disciples’ request for Jesus to send her away with her own repeated
requests for Jesus to have mercy. She factually negates his exclusive mission
to the Jews when she, a Gentile calls him Lord and worships him. Finally, she
cleverly turns his own maxim supporting exclusivism into an illustration of inclusivism
in salvation. Accepting the designation “dogs” for Gentiles, she turns it to
the Gentiles’ advantage. “Yes, Lord,” she counters Jesus, “but even the dogs
eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.” In her maxim the dogs and
the children both eat. And they eat simultaneously. She bests the Matthean
Jesus: She denies both exclusivism and sequential priority in salvation based
on ethnic identity. The Gentiles can have at least the crumbs of salvation if
not the bread, and they can have it now. She challenges Jesus to rise up to a
new, ethnically broadened sense of his mission and his Lordship. The woman’s
brash courage actually “converts” Jesus. Though Jesus had limited his mission
to the sons and daughters of Israel, here he crosses this self-imposed boundary
to bring merciful healing to a Gentile. The woman brings him to the full
implications of his mission.
This gospel passage thus
reveals that Jesus’ understanding of God’s saving work entails both the
particular and the universal. He knew that this woman was a Canaanite; he knew
that he was a Jew and had been sent to Israel yet this did not exclude the
limits of God’s gracious work in and through him. He also knew that God’s
redemptive work reached across the boundaries of difference without necessarily
obliterating them. God in Christ did not make this woman and her daughter into
something other than Canaanites, but in response to the woman’s faith he did
bring healing to her daughter.
This is reiterated by
Paul in the second reading of today who, writing to the Romans, asserts that he
who is, “an Israelite himself, a descendant of Abraham”, expresses hope for
Israel because “salvation has come to the Gentiles”. When either Gentiles or
Jews, women or men, are saved, they remain Gentiles or Jews, women or men, yet
they are saved in the same way i.e. through faith. And, this salvation is the
result of God’s grace and mercy which is blind to differences of ethnicity,
gender, or nationality.
The fact that such
differences to not constitute a barrier to the love of God do not mean,
however, that God’s saving work is meaninglessly indiscriminate. Those whom God
welcomes into his “house of prayer for all nations” are those who “bind
themselves to the Lord… to be his servants.” They are vessels of God’s justice.
As people of faith hey hear the Lord in the depths of their hearts calling them
to, “do what is right.” These are people like the Canaanite woman, who
persevered in faith in the only hope she had.
The call and challenge to
us today is to continue to persevere, even if at times it seems that our
prayers are not being answered and that there seems to be no solution in sight.
It is also an invitation to realize the inclusive nature of God’s unconditional
and magnanimous love.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You may use the "Anonymous" option to leave a comment if you do not possess a Google Account. But please leave your name and URL as www.errolsj.com