To read the texts click on the texts: 2 Kgs 5:1-15a; Lk 4:24-30
The
text begins with the words “Truly I tell you” which is used six times in the
Gospel of Luke and always to introduce a solemn statement. Luke alone uses it
here to introduce the proverb that follows. This proverb is found also in Mark
(6:4), Matthew (13:57) and John (4:44), but in a different form there. In Luke,
the proverb is given in a negative form and “hometown” may also be translated
as “home country”. This leads to the interpretation that Jesus will be rejected
not only by the people of Nazareth (his hometown) but also by the whole of
Israel (his home country).The references to Elijah and Elisha are to reinforce
the statement made namely that the blessings of God were not restricted to one
particular group or community but were available to all peoples. No one was
excluded from the graciousness of God and from his bounty. This statement of
Jesus enraged the people who were listening to him and drove Jesus out of their
town. Though they were hostile to him, Jesus did not let that deter him, but
continued to do what he was meant to do.
This
scene suggests that the basis for their hostility toward Jesus was a difference
in the way they read the Scriptures. The people of Jesus’ hometown read the
Scriptures as promises of God’s exclusive covenant with them, a covenant that
involved promises of deliverance from their oppressors. Jesus came announcing
deliverance, but it was not a national deliverance but God’s promise of
liberation for all the poor and oppressed regardless of nationality, gender, or
race. When the radical inclusiveness of Jesus’ announcement became clear to
those gathered in the synagogue in Nazareth, their commitment to their own
community boundaries took precedence over their joy that God had sent a prophet
among them. In the end, because they were not open to the prospect of others’
sharing in the bounty of God’s deliverance, they themselves were unable to
receive it.
Not
only is this scene paradigmatic of Jesus’ life and ministry, but it is also a
reminder that God’s grace is never subject to the limitations and boundaries of
any nation, church, group, or race. Those who would exclude others thereby
exclude themselves. Human beings may be instruments of God’s grace for others,
but we are never free to set limits on who may receive that grace. Throughout
history, the gospel has always been more radically inclusive than any group,
denomination, or church, so we continually struggle for a breadth of love and
acceptance that more nearly approximates the breadth of God’s love. The paradox
of the gospel, therefore, is that the unlimited grace that it offers so
scandalizes us that we are unable to receive it. Jesus could not do more for
his hometown because they were not open to him. How much more might God be able
to do with us if we were ready to transcend the boundaries of community and
limits of love that we ourselves have erected?
No comments:
Post a Comment
You may use the "Anonymous" option to leave a comment if you do not possess a Google Account. But please leave your name and URL as www.errolsj.com