Wednesday, 15 December 2021
Thursday, December 16, 2021 - When things do not go the way you want them to, where do you look for answers? Whom do you approach? Why?
To read the texts click on the texts: Isa 54:1-10; Lk 7:24-30
This
text appears immediately after the one which was read yesterday and after Jesus
had answered the question about Messiahship asked by John’s disciples. It
contains Jesus’ assessment of John and John’s role and, in doing so, defines
his own identity more clearly. The last two verses of this text are exclusive
to Luke. In the three questions that Jesus asks concerning John, it is obvious
that the first need not be answered because the answer is obvious. While reeds
shaken by the wind might be found in the wilderness, no one would go into the
wilderness to see them. The second is answered but its inadequacy is shown
immediately. Those who wear fine clothes are not found in places like the
wilderness, which is where John preached. The third answer, that John is a
prophet, is also inadequate because John is more than a prophet; his coming was
prophesied by scripture. John is not merely a prophet, but also the messenger
who would prepare the way for the coming Messiah. He is the forerunner of the
Lord and is thus, by implication, Elijah, and so is greater than any other
human being. However, as the forerunner, John is outside the kingdom since he
announces its coming. Thus, even the least that is in the kingdom is greater
than John. John was great and impressive.
Jesus is greater and more impressive. John is the precursor; Jesus is the one
whom John announces.
There
are times in our lives, especially when things do not go as we plan, when we
turn to faith healers and others in the hope that they will do for us what we
desire. These are like reeds shaken by the wind or, those who, because of their
desire to wear fine clothes, milk gullible people of all that they have. This
pericope, therefore, moves the reader from searching for figures or movements
that will satisfy their spiritual needs, to finding and accepting God’s justice
and God’s purposes. The answer is not in our attachment to any movement or
human figure, but in our submission to God’s claims on us. The two are
radically different. It is important
that we recognize the difference, and check our personal questing from time to
time, to be sure that we have not been fooled into substituting one for the
other. To be even the least among those who have submitted to God’s sovereignty
is to be greater than any of the prophetic figures outside the kingdom,
regardless of the appeal or their following
Tuesday, 14 December 2021
Wednesday, December 15, 2021 - What name do you use to address Jesus? Why?
To read the texts click on the texts: Isa 45:6-8,18, 21-26; Lk7:19-23
Though
Luke has mentioned earlier in his Gospel (3:20) that John was in prison, there
is nothing to suggest that he is still in prison when he asks the question
about Jesus’ identity. Here, the question is asked after John receives a report
from two of his disciples about the things that Jesus was doing. Thus, a number
of explanations have been offered as to why John asked this question of Jesus.
One reason is that John, after hearing the report from his disciples, was
troubled by uncertainty. If he was still in prison (as Matthew clearly states
he was when he sent his disciples to ask the question) then this uncertainty
would have been greater. Another reason is that John expected the Messiah to
come with spewing fire and venom, but Jesus was reaching out to people in
unconditional love. This surprised John since Jesus was not the kind of Messiah
he had expected. Another reason is that John, though not sure, was hopeful that
The Messiah, whose coming he had announced, had indeed come in Jesus and that
would vindicate his own proclamation.
Or, John thought that, by asking such a question of Jesus, he could
encourage him to make a public announcement so that all would know that the
Messianic age had arrived.
The
disciples sent by John repeat the question of John to Jesus. In his response to
them, who had probably seen, just then, the healings performed by him, Jesus
lists six prophetic actions. These actions are works which both Elijah and
Elisha had accomplished, as well as others mentioned in the book of Isaiah.
Jesus was not merely a prophet, like Elijah or Elisha; he was the fulfillment
of all the prophets. Besides healing those in need of it, the poor were also
promised redemption through the preaching of Jesus. Jesus’ answer ends with a
challenge not to have a stereotypical view of him or a preconceived notion that
will prevent one from encountering Jesus as he is. A blessing is pronounced on
those who will not reject him even though he turns out to be different from
what they expected, imagined, or hoped he would be.
Jesus
cannot be captured in an image, or picture, or put in a box. He remains bigger
than anything we can ever imagine. Thus, what is required if one is to
encounter him is to get rid of any categories that we may have used to define
him. Jesus fits no specific category and
yet, belongs to all of them. We sometimes think we know who Jesus is, what he
stands for, and what he is doing, and then he surprises us and does something
quite contrary to our expectations. Many scholars and holy men and women have
proposed first one understanding of who Jesus is, and then another. They are
all correct and all incorrect. Thus, the best response to Jesus is to be
constantly open to whatever revelation he decides to make and to keep our whole
being open in the hope that we will encounter him.
It
is only important for us to constantly realize that God has acted in Jesus, and
has been revealed as a God of the poor, a God who wants all people to be whole,
a God who reaches out to the lame, the blind, the deaf, the mute, and the scum
of society. God reaches out to tell them
that they are loved and honoured because they, too, are created in the image
and likeness of God. The ones who accept
this Jesus, will also accept that the mission he inaugurated is now their own,
and they are called to join him in continuing it as he would have done.
Monday, 13 December 2021
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 - Are you a person who says but does not do? Do you say YES but mean NO?
To read the texts click on the texts: Zeph 3:1-2, 9-13; Mt21:28-32
The parable, which is the text of today, is exclusive to Matthew and contains the first of three parables. These parables are all addressed to the chief priests and elders of the people, as a continuation of Jesus’ response to their challenge of his authority. Since they remained silent to his earlier question about John the Baptist, the Matthean Jesus begins this parable by forcing them to answer. He does this through the question, “What do you think?” The older son is first asked to go and work in the vineyard. He initially refuses, but afterwards, relents and goes. Since the older son refused him at first, the father then goes to the younger son and asks that he go and work in the vineyard. This son replied that would certainly go, but did not do so. Without any doubt, the one who did the will of the Father was the older son who was asked first.
The Parable does not seem to be so much about Jew and gentile as it is about religious leader and public sinner. Thus, Jesus is saying that the scum of society, though it says no to God, repents, performs the Father's will, and enters the kingdom, whereas the religious authorities loudly say yes to God but never do what he says, and therefore they fail to enter.
Both religious leaders and public sinners had John as a pointer of the way to Jesus and the kingdom. Yet, of these, while the sinners repented and believed, the religious did not, even after seeing sinners repent.
Lip service is easy. It does not require any action on the part of the person who gives it. This kind of person merely says, but will not do. Committed service is more difficult, because this calls for action and putting oneself out for the sake of another. It is not those who say “Lord, Lord”, but those who DO what God wants, who will gain entry into the kingdom.Sunday, 12 December 2021
Monday, December 13, 2021 - Do you usually mean what you say?
To read the texts click on the texts: Num24:2-7, 15-17; Mt 21:23-27
In these verses, in the
Gospel of Matthew, Jesus enters the
The answer of the chief priests and elders that they did not know is loaded with meaning. This is evident in the way they argued among themselves how they must respond. Thus, what they were in effect saying was that they knew, but did not want to say it aloud because that would lead to their being trapped in their own net. If they answered that John was from God, they would have to also answer why they did not accept him and his baptism. However, even more than that, they would have to answer why they are not accepting Jesus to whom John pointed. They could answer that John was not from God, or of human origin, since they were afraid of the people who regarded John as a prophet from God. This leads them to realize that it better not to answer at all. Jesus responds by refusing to answer their question, since they have shown that they do not have the authority to ask it. Since they have not opted for John, they have not opted for Jesus.
While it is true that a person will not know the answer to all questions and “I do not know” is an accepted and legitimate response because of the fragmentary nature of human knowledge, we must be careful in using “I do not know” when we really mean that we do not want to know or do not want to say. We may not want to know because the knowledge that we profess to have will demand a response from us. We may not be ready for this response and, thus, hide our closed minds under the words “I do not know”. We may not want to say because we are afraid of the consequences that our views will have, on us and, on others. We may prefer to let things be as they are rather than rock the boat and topple over ourselves.Saturday, 11 December 2021
Sunday, December 12, 2021 - Homily
The challenge is not to ask "What must we do?" The Challenge is to do it.
Sunday, December 12, 2021 - What must we do to receive his gift of peace?
To read the texts click on the texts: Zeph 3:14-18; Phil4:4-7; Lk 3:10-18
The
Third Sunday of Advent is called Gaudete Sunday. Gaudete is Latin for
‘rejoice.’ Rejoice is the first word of the Entrance Antiphon of today’s
liturgy. It is also a call found in the first and second readings of today. In
the first reading, the whole of Jerusalem is invited to rejoice because the
Lord has taken away all judgements and turned away all enemies. In the second
reading, Paul invites the community, at Philippi, to rejoice in the Lord
because the Lord is near. It is a positive command and one that Paul repeats so
as to make the call to rejoice emphatic.
We
realise that the Lord is near and that we must, indeed, rejoice because that is
true. We also realize that, in order that this rejoicing is genuine and
authentic. We must ask, like the groups in the Gospel text of today asked:
“What should we do?”
This
is the question that is asked of John the Baptist three times in the Gospel
text of today by three different groups of people. It is significant that the
question is not “How should we pray?” or “How often must we fast?” but “What
should we do?” It is an action-oriented question that has to do, not with
inward looking act of repentance but, with outward looking acts of justice and
mercy. It has to do, not with a withdrawal into the desert but, with an
immersion into the market place which is where true repentance is done.
Though
the content of John’s response to each group is different, because it is
specific to that group, the core is the same. Thus, repentance for the crowds
means not to put on sackcloth and ashes or even to offer sacrifices of burnt
offerings. Repentance means outward action. It is a willingness to share with
the less fortunate what one has. It is to realize that one has no right to
hoard and keep for oneself any extra and this is especially so when there are
so many who do not have even the bare minimum. The tax collectors and soldiers
are challenged to refrain from exploiting their positions for personal gain at
the expense of others. They were not to extort, but to be content with their
due. All of John’s responses call for an end to a self-centred and selfish
life, a life based on greed, self-satisfaction, and accumulation of material
possessions. John’s responses call for the beginning of a life that will show
actions of concern for one’s neighbour. Our change of heart will change the
attitude towards the poor.
This
change of heart and mind, as Zephaniah points out, is not the condition but the
consequence of the Lord’s coming in the midst of his people. In the ninth and
concluding oracle of the book, the people of Israel are called to witness the
presence of the Lord. This presence is one of unconditional and eternal love.
It is a presence in which, not only will the people rejoice over God but, God
will also rejoice over his people. The strife is ended, the discord is no more,
and the conflicts and disagreements are a thing of the past. Now, what matters
is that the judgement has been taken away and the reproach has been removed.
The
consequence of the Lord’s coming is, according to Paul, the gift of peace which
does not mean merely the absence of strife or conflict but the total well-being
of the person. It touches every aspect of a person’s life. It is a peace which
means both wholeness and oneness. It is not given to the individual alone but
also to all members of the community as a community.
In
order to receive this peace, it is necessary to rid our hearts and minds of
anything that might prevent it from entering our hearts and our world. As long
as we continue to be self centred and focused only on how much we can
accumulate for ourselves, this peace cannot be known. As long as we continue to
do injustice and not give others their just due, this peace cannot be known. As
long as we close our hearts and minds and ears to the cries of the millions of
our brothers and sisters who have never known or experienced love, this peace
cannot be known.
The
message of John the Baptist to the groups he addressed 2000 years ago still
finds an echo, even today. It is a message which asks us to eliminate greed and
voracity from our hearts because our greed deprives others of what they must
have. It is a message that challenges us never to be unjust and unfair to
others and give up the attitude of selfishness that turns us inward to dwell on
our concerns alone. John invites us to this other way of living which is a far
better way than the one we have been used to till now. We have not experienced
it because we have been too afraid to try it. The challenge, then, is not to
ask “What should we do?” The challenge for us is to do it.