To read the texts click on the texts: Col 1:15-20; Lk 5:33-39
In Luke, this episode about fasting continues from the previous
one (5:27-32) in which after the call of Levi (5:27-28), Jesus eats in Levi’s
house along with tax collectors and others. This table fellowship leads the
Pharisees to murmur. Jesus responds with a common proverb about only the sick
needing a physician and then emphasises that he has come to call not the
righteous but sinners to repentance (5:31–32). Luke omits Mark’s
introduction, which informs us that John’s disciples’ and the Pharisees were
fasting, and thus allows the conversation of the previous scene to continue. In
response to the comment that John’s disciples like those of the Pharisees fast
and pray, Jesus responds with a metaphor of a wedding feast and the
inappropriateness of the guests fasting while the wedding is in process and the
bridegroom is with them. While in Mark the new or unshrunk cloth is sought to
be sewn onto an old garment; in Luke the cloth is first torn from a new garment
and then sought to be put onto an old garment. In Luke the destructive effect
of tearing the new garment is highlighted. Lk 5:39 is exclusive to Luke and
brings out the closed attitude of those who do not want the new. They prefer to
stick to the old because they feel comfortable with it and are not willing to
change or see things from a new perspective. They insist that the old is good.
It is not always easy to accept change. We prefer to do things
the old way and feel comfortable when things remain the same. We must realise
that the only thing that is permanent is change and we must get used to it.
While we need not change just for the sake of changing, we must be open and
receptive to change and be ready to change when we have to.
Wonder if Luke later regretted writing the line - And no one after drinking old wine desires new; for he says, ‘The old is good.’ - as this could be misinterpreted as going against what he was conveying - not old v/s new but good v/s better.
ReplyDeleteYou are right about the misunderstanding. Matthew has "both are preserved" to avoid this confusion. See Mt 9:17
DeleteYou are right about the misunderstanding. Matthew has "both are preserved" to avoid this confusion. See Mt 9:17
Delete