To read the texts click on the texts: Jonah 1:1-2:1,11; Lk 10:25-37
Our
text for today contains the Parable of The Good Samaritan. This is a parable
that is found only in the Gospel of Luke, and the context in Luke is the
question that is asked by a lawyer regarding eternal life. In Matthew and Luke,
the lawyer is hostile (not so in Mark), because the question is asked to “test”
Jesus. While in Matthew (22:34-40) and Mark (12:28-31) the question is about
the greatest commandment, and Jesus answers the question quoting from
Deuteronomy and Leviticus, in Luke, Jesus asks the lawyer a counter question
and gets him (the lawyer) to answer.
Deuteronomy
6:4-9 (Love of God) was part of the “Shema” (the prayer to “Hear”), repeated
twice each day, but it had not been linked to Leviticus 19:18 (Love of
neighbour) as it is here. Since it is the lawyer who answers, Jesus responds
with a commendation (“You have answered right; do this, and you will live.”)
Since
the lawyer was forced to answer and cede the upper hand, he does not give up,
but asks a question over which there was some controversy – “Who is my
neighbour?” In his response to this question, Jesus tells the parable of the
Good Samaritan. This parable has often been interpreted as one in which Jesus
is telling us that those in need are our neighbours, or that it has an
anticlerical edge, in which Jesus is showing up the priestly class by
mentioning priest and Levite as not reaching out to the one in need. If these
were the meanings, then there would be no need to make the third person that
passed by that way, a Samaritan. The third person could have been a lay Jew.
The reason why the third person is a Samaritan is because Jesus wanted the
lawyer who was a Jew, to go beyond the narrow definition of neighbour, to go
beyond his prejudice, his bias, and his stereotyping. When Israel was split
into kingdoms after the death of Solomon in around 922 BCE, the North (named
Israel which had its capital at Samaria) and the South (Judah which had its
capital as Jerusalem), it became the target for its neighbours, because its
strength was divide. In 722 BCE, the Assyrians captured Israel and its capital
Samaria and took as their wives and concubines Israeli women. The children by
that union were known as Samaritans and till the time of Jesus were regarded as
inferior and outcasts by their former Jewish brothers (and sisters). Jesus is
thus asking the Jew (the lawyer) if he can get rid of his negative way of looking
at the Samaritan, and regard him also as neighbour. It is interesting that at
the end of the parable, Jesus overturns the lawyer’s question. Jesus asks, “Who
was neighbour to the one who fell among robbers?” whereas the lawyers question
was “Who is my neighbour?” The Samaritan is indeed, neighbour
We
often look at people with tainted glasses or a prejudiced vision. We tend to
categorise them and place them in neat compartments based on their backgrounds.
This attitude leads to stereotyping people and not being able to see them as
they are. Albert Einstein said this about a prejudice, “It is easier to
disintegrate an atom than a prejudice”.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You may use the "Anonymous" option to leave a comment if you do not possess a Google Account. But please leave your name and URL as www.errolsj.com