To read the texts click on the texts: 2 Kgs 5:1-15; Lk 4:24-30
The text begins with the
words “Truly I tell you” which is used six times in the Gospel of Luke and
always to introduce a solemn statement. Luke alone uses it here to introduce
the proverb that follows. This proverb is found also in Mark (6:4), Matthew (13:57) and John (4:44), but in a different form there. In Luke,
the proverb is given in a negative form and “hometown” may also be translated
as “home country”. This leads to the interpretation that Jesus will be rejected
not only by the people of Nazareth (his hometown) but also by the whole of
Israel (his home country). The references to Elijah and Elisha are to reinforce
the statement made namely that the blessings of God were not restricted to one
particular group or community but were available to all peoples. No one was
excluded from the graciousness of God and from his bounty. This statement of
Jesus enraged the people who were listening to him and drove Jesus out of their
town. Though they were hostile to him, Jesus did not let that deter him, but
continued to do what he was meant to do.
This scene suggests that the
basis for their hostility toward Jesus was a difference in the way they read
the Scriptures. The people of Jesus’ hometown read the Scriptures as promises
of God’s exclusive covenant with them, a covenant that involved promises of
deliverance from their oppressors. Jesus came announcing deliverance, but it
was not a national deliverance but God’s promise of liberation for all the poor
and oppressed regardless of nationality, gender, or race. When the radical
inclusiveness of Jesus’ announcement became clear to those gathered in the
synagogue in Nazareth,
their commitment to their own community boundaries took precedence over their
joy that God had sent a prophet among them. In the end, because they were not
open to the prospect of others’ sharing in the bounty of God’s deliverance,
they themselves were unable to receive it.
Not only is this scene
paradigmatic of Jesus’ life and ministry, but it is also a reminder that God’s
grace is never subject to the limitations and boundaries of any nation, church,
group, or race. Those who would exclude others thereby exclude themselves.
Human beings may be instruments of God’s grace for others, but we are never
free to set limits on who may receive that grace. Throughout history, the
gospel has always been more radically inclusive than any group, denomination,
or church, so we continually struggle for a breadth of love and acceptance that
more nearly approximates the breadth of God’s love. The paradox of the gospel,
therefore, is that the unlimited grace that it offers so scandalizes us that we
are unable to receive it. Jesus could not do more for his hometown because they
were not open to him. How much more might God be able to do with us if we were
ready to transcend the boundaries of community and limits of love that we ourselves
have erected?
No comments:
Post a Comment
You may use the "Anonymous" option to leave a comment if you do not possess a Google Account. But please leave your name and URL as www.errolsj.com