THE GOSPEL
OF MARK
The Gospel
of Mark is the shortest of the four canonical Gospels, and is regarded by many
as the first Gospel that was written and that Matthew and Luke have used Mark
extensively in writing their own Gospels.
Unlike the
Gospels of Matthew and Luke, which have Infancy narratives and a genealogy,
Mark has neither. His Gospel begins with the preaching of John the Baptist,
continues with the Baptism of Jesus by John and then moves on to the public
ministry of Jesus in Galilee, which is made up of preaching and healing. The
journey of Jesus to Jerusalem takes up a large part of Mark’s Gospel. Jesus
enters Jerusalem triumphantly, but soon encounters different groups
antagonistic to him and matters soon come to a head resulting in his passion,
crucifixion and death. Mark does not have any resurrection appearances of
Jesus, but has only an episode of the empty tomb. The Gospel ends quite
abruptly. The women who go to tomb to anoint the body of Jesus, which was not
there, are told by a young man at the tomb to tell the disciples that Jesus
would go before them to Galilee. However, the women say nothing to anyone
because they were afraid. Since this seems at first glance a strange way to end
the Gospel, verses 9-16 were added to Chapter 16. That these verses were added
later is confirmed by the fact that the style of these verses is quite
different from the rest of Mark’s Gospel and that these verses are a summary of
the resurrection appearances of Jesus in the other Gospels and the Acts of the
Apostles. Various reasons are offered for the ending of Mark at 16,8. Some of
those who think it was unintentional are of the opinion that the original
ending is lost, others that the author died before he could complete the
Gospel. However, there are others who are of the opinion that Mark deliberately
ended the Gospel at 16, 8 and the reason for this is the connection with the
Messianic secret.
There are
certain characteristics that are unique to Mark’s Gospel. These are as under:
1. Mark mentions explicitly and plainly that
Jesus was baptised by John in the Jordan (1,9). While Matthew also mentions
that it was John who baptised Jesus, he has a dialogue between Jesus and John
before the Baptism. It is only after Jesus “grants permission” to John that
John baptises him. Luke does not mention who baptised Jesus except that Jesus
was also baptised along with the people. One possible reason for this is that
the Evangelists were struggling with how they were to narrate the Baptism of
Jesus and that too at the hands of John who in all the Gospels is inferior to
Jesus. Thus it is assumed that Matthew and Luke writing after Mark made changes
to the Marcan text. This is also given as one reason for the priority of Mark
and the historicity of the Baptism of Jesus.
2. The testing of Jesus in the wilderness
does not have a dialogue between Jesus and Satan (1,12-13) like Matthew and
Luke have. Mark is the only one of the three who mentions wild beats in his
narrative (1,14).
3. Jesus’ saying “The Sabbath was made for
man, not man for the Sabbath” (2,27) is found only in Mark. It is possible that
Matthew and Luke found this saying too radical to include in their Gospels.
4. Mark’s is the only Gospel in which the
family of Jesus come to restrain him because they think he has lost his mind
(3,21-22). Matthew and Luke omit this scene from their narratives.
5. Mark is the only writer in the New
Testament who refers to Jesus as “son of Mary” (6,3). Though some think that
Mark refers to Jesus in this manner because Joseph was dead by that time, a
more probable explanation is that the townspeople of Jesus wanted to insult him
by using this title. They could be saying that they knew who his mother was,
but not his father.
6. Only in Mark among the Synoptic Gospels
does Jesus twice use external methods to cure (7,31-37 and 8,22-26). In the
first of the two, one probable explanation is that since Jesus is in Gentile
territory, he uses the methods of Gentile faith healers. In the second, since
Mark alone has the scene where Jesus asks the disciples about his identity
(8,27-30) immediately after this miracle, he could be comparing the two stages
of the man’s healing to the two answers that are given about Jesus’ identity.
7. The disciples’ in Mark are shown in a very
poor light. Though they travel with Jesus and are with him constantly, they are
not able to understand who he really is despite numerous explanations that
Jesus gives about himself and his mission.
8. Mark’s Gospel is known as the Gospel of
the Messianic Secret, which is connected with the command to silence. Often in
the Gospel, those who are healed are commanded or warned not to tell anyone who
healed them and demons are always commanded not to make the identity of Jesus
known. The explanation for this which has found favour with many is that Jesus
did not want to be known only as a wonder worker or exorcist, but as the
suffering son of God. This is also why after the first Passion and Resurrection
prediction (8,31), there is no command to silence {except when they come down
from the mountain of Transfiguration and here a time limit is set namely “until
the Son of Man should have risen from the dead” (9,9)}.
9. Son of Man is the major title used of
Jesus in Mark. Jesus refers to himself as Son of Man a number of times in the
Gospel (Mark 2:10, 2:28; 8:31; 9:9, 9:12, 9:31; 10:33, 10:45; 14:21, 14:41).
Many have seen that this title is a very important one within Mark’s Gospel,
and it has important implications for Mark’s Christology. Jesus raises a question
that demonstrates the association in Mark between ‘Son of Man’ (compare Daniel
7:13-14) and the suffering servant in Isaiah 52:13-53:12 – “How then is it
written about the Son of Man, that he is to go through many sufferings and be
treated with contempt?” (9:12b) Yet this comparison is not explicit; Mark’s
Gospel creates this link between Daniel and Isaiah, and applies it to Christ.
It’s postulated that this is because of the persecution of Christians; thus,
Mark’s Gospel encourages believers to stand firm (Mark 13:13) in the face of
troubles.
10. Mark often uses in his Gospel what is known
as “Sandwich construction”. This means that an incident is begun, interrupted
with another incident that is completed, and then the first incomplete and
interrupted incident is completed.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You may use the "Anonymous" option to leave a comment if you do not possess a Google Account. But please leave your name and URL as www.errolsj.com