To read the texts click here: Isa 25: 6-10; Mt 15:29-37
While in a similar context,
Mark narrates the story of the healing of a deaf man with an impediment in his
speech, (Mk 7:31-37) Matthew omits this miracle and instead, introduces the
miracle of the feeding of the four thousand. While the miracle of the feeding of
the five thousand is the only miracle narrated by all the four Gospels, this
miracle is narrated by Mark and Matthew. While it is clear that Mark wanted to
show two separate feedings, the first and more abundant for the Jews (Mk
6:35-44) and the second and less abundant, for the Gentiles (Mk. 8:1-10), this
cannot be Matthew’s intention, because in his Gospel, there seems to be no
scope for a Gentile mission. This is why Matthew has altered Mark
substantially. All of Mark’s references, to show this as a Gentile feeding,
have been omitted or altered by Matthew. Thus, Matthew omits Mark’s Gentile
location in the Decapolis, as well as the Markan note that some had come from a
great distance. Matthew’s picture is thoroughly Jewish—the “God of Israel” who
is praised in Matthew’s conclusion, is not a Gentile acclamation but is in the
language of Israel’s own liturgy (Pss 40:14; 71:18; 105:48; Lk 1:68). In
addition to preserving it simply because it was in Mark, Matthew seems to
welcome another picture, useful in this section that portrays Jesus acting
compassionately for Israel while in conflict with the Jewish leadership. In Matthew’s retelling, the two feedings have
been assimilated to each other, so that he emphasizes the similarities between
the two feedings rather than the differences between them. The Messiah of
Israel, typically, almost stereotypically, heals and feeds.
A number of interpretations
have been given to explain this miracle. The main ones are:
(1) A miraculous event of
feeding hungry people actually happened in the life of Jesus. Jesus was such a
charismatic figure that people went away from his presence healed and filled.
(2) A symbolic meal was
conducted by Jesus for his followers, foreshadowing the messianic banquet. This
was later elaborated into a miracle story in which the numbers were
exaggerated.
(3) Jesus gave the people a
lesson in altruism or unselfishness by sharing with others the little food that
he and his disciples had with them. This action of Jesus motivated others to do
the same and there was enough for all.
(4) The story is not fact,
but symbol. It summarizes the life of Jesus. His was a life of selflessness and
service, a life of giving to everyone who was in need.
However the story may be
interpreted, what comes across strongly is the concern and compassion that
Jesus has for the crowd. It is a
practical concern, one that shows itself in action.
The abundance of the remains, even after such a large number of people
have been fed, stresses the generosity of God, revealed in Jesus. Our God is a
generous God who gives not only bread to the hungry, but even his very self. He
showed this through the Incarnation and the ministry of Jesus. However, this
was shown in the most perfect of ways on the Cross. The miracle is thus a call
to accept the generosity of God and to show that we have accepted it by the
generosity we show to others.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You may use the "Anonymous" option to leave a comment if you do not possess a Google Account. But please leave your name and URL as www.errolsj.com