To read the texts click on the texts: Isa 56:1, 6-7; Rom11:13-15,29-32; Mt 15:21-28
It took Winston Churchill three years to get
through the eighth grade, because he could not pass English. Ironically, many
years later he was asked to give the commencement address at the Oxford
University. His now famous speech consisted of only three words: “Never give
up!” While this theme of perseverance and never giving up is surely one of the
themes of the readings of today, another theme that also comes out powerfully
is the movement from particularity to the universality of God’s love.
There is no doubt that Jesus
appears to be speaking to the Canaanite woman in the Gospel text of today in
extremely harsh terms. He disregards the heartfelt and sincere plea for mercy
made by the woman, and makes it clear that his mission, at this time, is for
the lost sheep of the house of Israel, and even likens the woman to a dog. Some
have attempted to soften this harshness by suggesting that Jesus’ retort to the
woman was said with a twinkle in his eye and a smile on his lips or that Jesus
did not mean stray dogs but house pets. However, nothing in the text warrants
such interpretations and when compared with the similar incident in Mark, which
allows for a mission to the Gentiles following the mission to the Jews, the
retort of Jesus in Matthew is harsher, leaving no apparent scope for a Gentile
mission: “It is not good to take the children’s bread and throw it to the
dogs.”
The Jews are the children and the
Gentiles are the dogs. The epithet “dogs” for Gentiles had derogatory
connotations. Dogs roamed the streets scavenging for food, and the Jews
considered them unclean animals. The Gentiles cannot get what belongs to the
Jews. Thus Jesus not only flatly refuses the woman’s request, he also seems to
insult her.
The woman, however, will neither
be excluded nor allow herself to be insulted. She will persevere and will
overcome. She will keep on keeping on. She will neither give up nor give in.
She meets Jesus’ initial stony silence with more pleading. She drowns out the
disciples’ request for Jesus to send her away with her own repeated requests
for Jesus to have mercy. She factually negates his exclusive mission to the
Jews when she, a Gentile, calls him Lord and worships him. Finally, she
cleverly turns his own maxim supporting exclusivism into an illustration of inclusivism
in salvation. Accepting the designation “dogs” for Gentiles, she turns it to
the Gentiles’ advantage. “Yes, Lord,” she counters Jesus, “but even the dogs
eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.” In her maxim, the dogs and
the children both eat. And they eat simultaneously. She bests the Matthean
Jesus: She denies both exclusivism and sequential priority in salvation based
on ethnic identity. The Gentiles can have at least the crumbs of salvation if
not the bread, and they can have it now. She challenges Jesus to rise up to a
new, ethnically broadened sense of his mission and his Lordship. The woman’s
brash courage actually “converts” Jesus. Though Jesus had limited his mission
to the sons and daughters of Israel, here he crosses this self-imposed boundary
to bring merciful healing to a Gentile. The woman brings him to the full
implications of his mission.
This Gospel passage thus reveals
that Jesus’ understanding of God’s saving work entails both the particular and
the universal. He knew that this woman was a Canaanite; he knew that he was a
Jew and had been sent to Israel yet this did not exclude the limits of God’s
gracious work in and through him. He also knew that God’s redemptive work
reached across the boundaries of difference without necessarily obliterating
them. God in Christ did not make this woman and her daughter into something
other than Canaanites, but in response to the woman’s faith he did bring
healing to her daughter.
This is reiterated by Paul in the
second reading of today who, writing to the Romans, asserts that he who is, “an
Israelite himself, a descendant of Abraham”, expresses hope for Israel because
“salvation has come to the Gentiles”. When either Gentiles or Jews, women or
men, are saved, they remain Gentiles or Jews, women or men, yet they are saved
in the same way i.e. through faith. And, this salvation is the result of God’s
grace and mercy which is blind to differences of ethnicity, gender, or
nationality.
The fact that such differences do
not constitute a barrier to the love of God does not mean, however, that God’s
saving work is meaninglessly indiscriminate. Those whom God welcomes into his
“house of prayer for all nations” are those who “bind themselves to the Lord…
to be his servants.” They are vessels of God’s justice. As people of faith they
hear the Lord in the depths of their hearts calling them to, “do what is
right”. These are people like the Canaanite woman, who persevered in faith in
the only hope she had.
The call and challenge to us
today is to continue to persevere, even if at times it seems that our prayers
are not being answered and that there seems to be no solution in sight. It is
also an invitation to realize the inclusive nature of God’s unconditional and
magnanimous love.
She bests the Matthean Jesus: Infuses Immense Hope,n
ReplyDelete