To read the texts click on the texts: 1 Sam 17:32-33,37,40-51; Mk 3:1-6
The Gospel text of today concerns a Sabbath controversy. Though
Mark does not specify at the beginning of this episode who it was that was
watching Jesus for a reason to accuse him, at the end of the episode they are
named as Pharisees and Herodians. While Pharisees had no political authority at
the time of Jesus, they were influential. Herodians were a group of wealthy
people who were partisans of Herod Antipas.
It is important to note that Jesus does nothing to break the
Sabbath rest, but his question is the reason for the hostility. The response to
Jesus' question is silence which here may be interpreted as an indication of
the hostility of his opponents and of their intention to destroy him. Anyone
who truly cares about the law will agree with Jesus and rejoice that a man has
been made whole again. Though the man in this case is not in any way near
death, Jesus adds to the second part of his question the words "to save
life or to kill?" This seems to be Mark's way of anticipating the
intentions of Jesus' opponents. The point he seems to be making is that they
object to someone being made whole on the Sabbath because they are concerned
about the law, yet on the same Sabbath, they will not hesitate to plot the
destruction of someone else. The contrast between their words and their deeds
is strongly brought out.
Often in our lives there is a dichotomy between what we say and
what we do. Our actions do not always match our words. There are also times
when we say one thing and do another. The call of the text of today is to be as
consistent as we possibly can. One way of doing this is to avoid judging others
too easily. Another way would be to avoid promising what we know we will not be
able to deliver and to think carefully before we speak and commit.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You may use the "Anonymous" option to leave a comment if you do not possess a Google Account. But please leave your name and URL as www.errolsj.com